JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 16, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Hernany Alberto Triana Aldana

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Aclaracion Sentencia De Constitucionalidad
  • Oportunidad para solicitarla
  • Reglas
  • Improcedencia
  • Procedencia excepcional
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Aplicación del artículo 309 del Código de Procedimiento Civil para su procedencia
2 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia c-167/95, se encuentra que la solicitud de aclaración fue presentada 14 años después de la ejecutoria de la sentencia, por lo tanto se decide rechazar la solicitud por extemporánea.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por extemporanea, la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano Hernany Alberto Triana Aldana para que se aclare la sentencia C-167 de 1995.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese la presente providencia al interesado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.